Atmatzidou, S.; Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: a study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, pp. 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
Baas, J.; Schotten, M.; Plume, A.; Côté, G.; Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), pp. 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Callon, M.; Courtial, J.-P.; Turner, W. A.; Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Sciences Information, 22(2), pp. 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
Chen, C. (1999). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), pp. 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), pp. 1-40. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10063059
Chen, G.; Shen, J.; Barth-Cohen, L.; Jiang, S.; Huang, X.; Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, pp. 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001
Cheng, Y.-P.; Lai, C.-F.; Chen, Y.-T.; Wang, W.-S.; Huang, Y.-M.; Wu, T.-T. (2023a). Enhancing student’s computational thinking skills with student-generated questions strategy in a game-based learning platform. Computers & Education, 200, 104794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794
Cheng, L.; Wang, X.; Ritzhaupt, A. (2023b). The effects of computational thinking integration in STEM on students’ learning performance in K-12 education: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2). 10.1177/07356331221114183
Cobo, M. J.; López-Herrera, A. G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), pp. 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
de Araujo, A. L. S. O.; Andrade, W. L.; Serey Guerrero, D. D. (2016). A systematic mapping study on assessing computational thinking abilities. 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Estados Unidos, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757678
del Olmo-Muñoz, J.; Cózar-Gutiérrez, R.; González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers & Education, 150, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832
Dominko, M., & Verbič, M. (2019). The economics of subjective well-being: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1973–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0022-z
Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, pp. 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039
Durak, H. Y.; Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, pp. 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
Espinal, A.; Vieira, C.; Magana, A. J. (2024). Professional development in computational thinking: a systematic literature review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(2), pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3648477
Falloon, G. (2024). Advancing young students’ computational thinking: An investigation of structured curriculum in early years primary schooling. Computers & Education, 216, 105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105045
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), pp. 108-111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
Gonda, D. E.; Luo, J.; Lei, C.-U.; Leung, T. Y. E. (2021). Teaching computational thinking: designing students’ learning experience through blended learning in higher education engineering courses in HKU. Blended Learning for Inclusive and Quality Higher Education in Asia, pp. 195-214.
Grover, S.; Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12. Educational Researcher , 42(1), pp. 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12463051
Grover, S.; Pea, R.; Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), pp. 199-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142
Grgurina, N.; Yeni, S. (2021). Computational thinking in context across curriculum. Informatics in Schools. Rethinking Computing Education - 14th International Conference on Informatics in Schools.
Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M.; Martínez, M. Á.; Moral-Munoz, J. A.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), pp. 1275-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
Hariyanto, D.; Asmara, A.; Chandra, A.; Yatmono, S. (2023). The development of online instructional design for computational thinking to improve student problem-solving skill. AIP Conference Proceedings 2671. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114185
Harzing, A.-W.; Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), pp. 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Hijón-Neira, R.; Connolly, C.; Pérez-Marín, D. (2023). Prototype of a recommendation model with artificial intelligence for computational thinking improvement of secondary education students. Computers, 12(113). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12060113
Herman, I.; Melancon, G.; Marshall, M. S. (2000). Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(1), pp. 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/2945.841119
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), pp. 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hong, L. (2023). The impact of educational robots on students’ computational thinking: a meta‐analysis of K‐12. Education and Information Technologies, 29, pp. 13813-13838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12415-y
Hsu, T.-C.; Chang, S.-C.; Hung, Y.-T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, pp. 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
Huang, S.-Y.; Tarng, W.; Ou, K.-L. (2023). Effectiveness of ar board game on computational thinking and programming skills for elementary school students. Systems, 11(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010025
Jacob, S.; Nguyen, H.; Garcia, L.; Richardson, D.; Warschauer, M. (2020). Teaching computational thinking to multilingual students through inquiry-based learning. 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). Portland: Estados Unidos, pp. 1-8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9272487/
Kong, S.-C.; Chiu, M. M.; Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127, pp. 178-189.
Lathifah, A.; Asrowi, A.; Efendi, A. (2023). Students’ perspectives on game-based learning and computational thinking. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(3).
Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics, 11(5), pp. 295-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02279351
Li, J.; Goerlandt, F.; Reniers, G. (2021a). An overview of scientometric mapping for the safety science community: methods, tools, and framework. Safety science, 134, 105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105093
Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Liu, J. (2021b). Development and validation of computational thinking assessment of chinese elementary school students. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, pp. 1-15.
Li, W.; Liu, C.-Y.; Tseng, J. (2023a). Effects of the interaction between metacognition teaching and students’ learning achievement on students’ computational thinking, critical thinking, and metacognition in collaborative programming learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28, pp. 12919-12943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11671-2
Li, Q.; Jiang, Q.; Liang, J.-C.; Xiong, W.; Liang, Y.; Zhao, W. (2023b). Effects of interactive unplugged programming activities on computational thinking skills and student engagement in elementary education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, pp. 12293-12318.
Lu, Z.; Chiu, M.; Cui, Y.; Mao, W.; Lei, H. (2022). Effects of game-based learning on students’ computational thinking: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, pp. 1-22.
Martínez, M. A.; Cobo, M. J.; Herrera, M.; Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), pp. 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514522101
Matere, I.; Weng, C.; Astatke, M.; Hsia, C.-H.; Fan, C.-G. (2021). Effect of design-based learning on elementary students computational thinking skills in visual programming maker course. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1938612
Merino-Armero, J.; González-Calero, J.; Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. (2021). The effect of after-school extracurricular robotic classes on elementary students’ computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1946564
Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), pp. 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Nalimov, V. V.; Mulchenko, Z. M. (1971). Measurement of science. Study of the development of science as an information process. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED065286
Noyons, E. C. M.; Moed, H. F.; Van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46(3), pp. 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459614
Polat, E.; Hopcan, S.; Kucuk, S.; Sisman, B. (2021). A comprehensive assessment of secondary school students’ computational thinking skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, pp. 1-16.
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Rojas, A.; García-Peñalvo, F. (2020). Assessment of computational thinking skills to predict student learning and retention in the subject programming computer in higher education. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(63). http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.409991
Shang, X.; Jiang, Z.; Chiang, F.-K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, D. (2023). Efects of robotics STEM camps on rural elementary students’ self‐efcacy and computational thinking. Education Technology Research and Development, 71, pp. 1135-1160.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Scienc, 24(4), pp. 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Souza, I. M. L.; Andrade, W. L.; Sampaio, L. M. R. (2021). Educational robotics applied to computational thinking development: a systematic mapping study. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637185
Sun, L.; Hu, L.; Zhou, D. (2022). The bidirectional predictions between primary school students’ STEM and language academic achievements and computational thinking: the moderating role of gender. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101043
Tang, X.; Yin, Y.; Lin, Q.; Hadad, R.; Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
van Eck, N. J.; Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
van Eck, N. J.; Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), pp. 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Verma, S.; Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: a bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, pp. 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric methods: pitfalls and possibilities. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 97(5), pp. 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x
Wang, C.-Y.; Gao, B.-L.; Chen, S.-J. (2024). The efects of metacognitive scafolding of project‐based learning environments on students’ metacognitive ability and computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 29, pp. 5485-5508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12022-x
Wang, C.-J.; Zhong, H.-X.; Chiu, P.-S.; Chang, J.-H.; Wu, P.-H. (2022). Research on the impacts of cognitive style and computational thinking on college students in a visual artificial intelligence course. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864416/full
Waterman, K.; Goldsmith, L.; Pasquale, M. (2020). Integrating computational thinking into elementary science curriculum: an examination of activities that support students’ computational thinking in the service of disciplinary learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, pp. 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09801-y
Weng, X.; Ye, H.; Dai, Y.; Ng, O. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and computational thinking in educational contexts: a systematic review of instructional design and student learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0), pp. 1-31.
White, H. D.; McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), pp. 327-355.
Xu, E.; Wang, W.; Wang, Q. (2023). A meta‐analysis of the efectiveness of programming teaching in promoting K‐12 students’ computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11445-2
Yang, F.-C.; Lai, H.-M.; Wang, Y.-W. (2023). Effect of augmented reality-based virtual educational robotics on programming students’ enjoyment of learning, computational thinking skills, and academic achievement. Computers & Education, 195, 104721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104721
Yang, K.; Liu, X.; Chen, G. (2020). The influence of robots on students’ computational thinking: A literature review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology (IJIET), 10(8), pp. 627-631. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.8.1435
Ye, H.; Liang, B.; Ng, O.; Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: a systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
Yilmaz, R.; Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4.
Yolcu, V.; Demirer, V. (2023). The effects of educational robotics in programming education on students’ programming success, computational thinking, and transfer of learning. Computer Applications and Engineering Education, 31(6).
Zhang, L.; Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers & Education, 141, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
Zhang; J.-H., Meng, B.; Zou, L.-C.; Zhu, Y.; Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Progressive flowchart development scaffolding to improve university students’ computational thinking and programming self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943687
Zhu, J.; Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), pp. 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
Zupic, I.; Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), pp. 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
