Allchin, D.; Zemplén, G. Á. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Sci-ence. Science Education, 104(5), pp. 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589
Andrieiev, A. M.; Tykhonska, N. I. (2020). Methods of development of experimental skills in students in the conditions of distance form of learning. Scientific Notes of Kherson State University, 90, pp. 22–27. https://doi.org/10.32999/KSU2413-1865/2020-90-4
Andryushechkin, S. M. (2024). Home experiment as a means of enhancing pupils’ cognitive activity in studying the comprehensive school physics course. Pedagogika. Voprosy Teorii i Praktiki. https://doi.org/10.30853/ped20240040
Antonio, R. P.; Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive Argument-Driven Inquiry in Teaching Antimicrobial Resistance: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Argumentation Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
Baník, I.; Pavlendová, G. (2019). Home experiments – A way to increase the interest of young people in physics, tech-nology and natural sciences. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2152, 030002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5124746
Ferguson, L. E.; Bubikova-Moan, J. (2019). Argumentation as a pathway to critical thinking. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332246917
Gapasin, L.; Manongsong, J.; Tukuran, A.; Rodriguez, L.; Alquizar, J.; Manial, N.; Amba, Z.; Balaños, J.; Mahinay, H. (2022). Home-Based Learning Interventions of Science Teachers in the Absence of Laboratory Experiments. Ameri-can Journal of Education and Technology, 1(2), pp. 95–98. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.593
Guilfoyle, L.; Hillier, J.; Fancourt, N. (2023). Students’ argumentation in the contexts of science, religious education, and interdisciplinary science-religious education scenarios. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1947223
Gülen, S.; Dönmez, İ. (2024). Valuating the effect of Toulmin Argumentation Model on critical thinking and epistemo-logical beliefs in online education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 50(2), pp. 140–158. https://doi.org/10.35923/JES.2024.2.09
Hendratmoko, A. F.; Madlazim, M.; Widodo, W.; Astutik, S. (2024). Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An in-novative learning model to improve students’ skills in scientific argumentation. TEM Journal, 13(4), pp. 3295–3303. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem134-64
Hernández-Sampieri, R.; Torres, C. P. M. (2018). Metodología de la investigación, 4ª ed., México D.F., McGraw-Hill In-teramericana.
Kruit, P. M.; Bredeweg, B.; Nieuwelink, H. (2025). Enhancing students’ argumentation skills, content knowledge, and Nature of Science understanding through a web-based educational instrument in the context of socio-scientific is-sues. International Journal of Science Education, 47(6), pp. 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2348824
Kuki, A. D.; Agustini, R.; Azizah, U. (2023). Analysis of effectiveness Argument-Driven Inquiry to improve students’ argumentation skill and conceptual understanding. IJORER, 4(3), pp. 329–342. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i3.316
Lara, R. S.; Moreno, T.; De Fuentes, A. (2022). La argumentación escrita y la estrategia de escritura colaborativa en el currículum de educación superior. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 14(4), pp. 521–530.
Larrain, A.; Singer, V.; Moran, C.; Sánchez, Á.; Silva, M.; Villavicencio, C.; Strasser, K.; Howe, C.; López, P.; Pinochet, J. (2021). Argumentation skills mediate the effect of peer argumentation on content knowledge in middle-school stu-dents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), pp. 736–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000619
Liu, C.-C.; Wen, C.-T.; Chang, H.-Y.; Chang, M.-H.; Lai, P.-H.; Fan, S.-H.; Yang, C.-W.; Hwang, F.-K. (2022). Augmenting the effect of virtual labs with teacher demonstration and student critique instructional designs to scaffold the de-velopment of scientific literacy. Instructional Science, 50(2), pp. 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09571-4
Ma, N.; Guo, J.-H.; Sun, Y.-F. (2025). Evaluating scientific argumentation ability: A framework based on scientific argu-mentation maps. International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2462796
Melta, D.; Razak, A.; Yohandri, Y. (2024). The impact of the Argument-Driven Inquiry instructional model on biodiversi-ty topics to enhance students’ argumentation skills. Bioedunis Journal, 3(1), pp. 73–86. https://doi.org/10.24952/bioedunis.v3i1.11217
Mukuka, A.; Tatira, B. (2025). Analysis of pre-service mathematics teachers’ proof comprehension through Toulmin’s argumentation model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), pp. 111–130. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp111-130
Muñoz-Campos, V.; Franco-Mariscal, A. J.; Blanco-López, Á. (2020). Integración de prácticas científicas de argumenta-ción, indagación y modelización en un contexto de la vida diaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 17(3), 3201. https://doi.org/10.25267/rev_eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i3.3201
Muntholib, M.; Munadhiroh, A.; Setiawan, N.; Yahmin, Y. (2021). High school students’ scientific argumentation on chemical equilibrium. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330, 020046. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043236
Моклюк, М.; Сільвейстр, А.; Моклюк, О. (2024). Домашній фізичний експеримент і можливості його проведення в сучасних умовах. Математика, Інформатика, Фізика: Наука та Освіта, 1(2), pp. 160–170. https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-1955/2024-01-02-07
Osborne, J. F.; Borko, H.; Fishman, E.; Gomez, F.; Berson, E.; Busch, K. C.; Reigh, E.; Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a prac-tice-based professional development program on elementary teachers’ facilitation of and student engagement with scientific argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), pp. 1067–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059
Pillaga-Guamán, L.; Garcia-Herrera, D. G.; Cárdenas-Cordero, N. M.; Erazo-Álvarez, J. C. (2020). Aprendizaje basado en problemas: una estrategia de enseñanza en la asignatura de Ciencias Naturales. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria Koinonía, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35381/r.k.v5i1.787
Putra, P. D.; Ahmad, N.; Budiarso, A. S.; Indrawati. (2023). Development of argumentation tools based on the engineer-ing design process to improve students’ argumentation skills. New Educational Review, 71(1), pp. 114–125. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.71.1.09
Rapanta, C. (2019). Argumentation as critically oriented pedagogical dialogue. Informal Logic, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i1.5116
Riyanti, V.; Hamdiyati, Y.; Purwianingsih, W. (2023). The effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry on argumentation skills and students’ concept mastering of human excretory system materials. Journal of Science Learning, 6(2), pp. 125–135. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.54634
Sellberg, C.; Nazari, Z.; Solberg, M. (2024). Virtual laboratories in STEM higher education: A scoping review. Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23865/njsre.v2.5766
Su, G.; Sun, J.; Long, T.; Chen, W.; Mei, A. (2025). Applying Argumentation-Driven Inquiry to promote students’ argu-mentation performance in blended synchronous learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technolo-gy, 34(2), pp. 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10190-0
Sypsas, A.; Paxinou, E.; Zafeiropoulos, V.; Kalles, D. (2024). Virtual laboratories in STEM education: A focus on Onlabs, a 3D virtual reality biology laboratory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1135, pp. 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70771-1_16
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Utami, S.; Haryanto, H.; Subagyo, A. (2024). The development of electronic students’ worksheets (E-LKPD) based on Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills. Integrated Science Education Journal, 5(2), pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v5i2.810
Villanueva, R.; Prieto, J. (2021). La enseñanza de la argumentación escrita en ciencias naturales a partir del uso de ruti-nas de pensamiento. Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje, 7(1), pp. 189–208. https://doi.org/10.22370/ieya.2021.7.1.2000
Walker, J. P.; Van, A. G.; Lower, M. A. (2019). Facilitating argumentation in the laboratory: The challenges of claim change and justification by theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), pp. 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00745
