logo

Strengthening Computational Thinking in High School Students through Programming with Arduino UNO

10.24050/reia.v22i44.1871
Published 2025-07-11
Articles

Abstract

Computational Thinking has emerged as an essential skill in education, particularly in the context of Industry 4.0, especially for high school students. This article aims to enhance computational thinking among secondary school students through computer programming using the Arduino UNO microcontroller, integrated into pedagogical activities that foster problem-solving and automation. The research methodology adopted a non-experimental qualitative approach, in which students with prior programming knowledge designed, constructed, and tested physical prototypes to address real-world problems. The process began with a diagnostic test to assess programming logic, followed by an introduction to programming syntax and interaction with the microcontroller. The results demonstrated significant improvements in students’ technical skills and their motivation for active learning in programming and robotics. Additionally, collaborative learning, creativity, and problem-solving abilities were highlighted as students worked in teams to develop their projects. However, certain limitations were identified, including the availability of material resources and the need for further teacher training. In conclusion, the use of the Arduino UNO as an educational tool effectively contributes to the development of technological competencies and provides an accessible and engaging environment for active learning. This approach is vital in preparing students for the challenges of Industry 4.0 and an increasingly digitized world.

Keywords

Categories

Authors

References

Akib, E.; Muhsin, Muh. A. (2019). Assessment of teaching in 21st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1), 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012065

Alsina, A.; Acosta, Y. (2022). Conectando la educación matemática infantil y el pensamiento computacional: Aprendizaje de patrones de repetición con el robot educativo programable Cubetto®. Innovaciones Educativas, 24(37), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v24i37.4022

Autodesk, I. (2024). Tinkercad [Simulador en línea]. https://www.tinkercad.com

Ávalos Dávila, C.; Arbaiza Lecue, N. Z.; Ajenjo Servia, P. (2021). Calidad educativa y nuevas metodologías de enseñanza-aprendizaje: Retos, necesidades y oportunidades para una visión disruptiva de la profesión docente. Innovaciones Educativas, 23(35), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v23i35.3477

Balon, B.; Duric, J.; Simic, M. (2021). Arduino platform as learning tool in high school and college education. 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO 2021), 688–693. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9597141

Bianchi, A.; Moon, K. J.; Dementyev, A.; Je, S. (2024). BlinkBoard: Guiding and monitoring circuit assembly for synchronous and remote physical computing education. HardwareX, 17, e00511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00511

Buachoom, A.; Thedsakhulwong, A.; Wuttiprom, S. (2019). An Arduino board with ultrasonic sensor investigation of simple harmonic motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1380(1), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012098

Cabezas, C.; Carrera, O. (2024). Enfoque STEM en la educación y formación docente en el Distrito Noroccidente de la Mancomunidad del Chocó Andino. Mamakuna, 23, 48–62. https://revistas.unae.edu.ec/index.php/mamakuna/article/view/946

Corrales-Álvarez, M.; Ocampo, L. M.; Cardona-Torres, S. A. (2024). Definiciones del pensamiento computacional. Una revisión de la literatura. Revista EIA, 21(42), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia

de Educación, S. (2016). Plan nacional decenal de educación 2016–2026 (1–84). Ministerio de Educación Nacional. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1780/articles-392871_recurso_1.pdf

Deepti Raj, G.; Prabadevi, B.; Gopal, R. (2024). Evolution of Industry 4.0 and its fundamental characteristics. En Disruptive Technologies and Digital Transformations for Society 5.0 (pp. 1–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8118-2_1

Dimitrova, G.; Marinova, M. (2024). Digital transformation of higher education: Model for digital learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3078(1), 020053. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0208135

El Hadi, M.; El Moussaouy, A.; Ouariach, A.; Essaadaoui, R.; Hachmi, A.; Laabidi, K.; Magrez, H.; Meziani, Y. M. (2020). Real time free fall investigation for educational purposes using Arduino Uno board. Physics Education, 55(5), 055018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aba12f

Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R. (2021). Transitioning of steel producers to the steelworks 4.0 – Literature review with case studies. Energies, 14(14), 4391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144109

Gobierno de Colombia. Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo. (2023). https://www.mincit.gov.co

Guevara, G.; Verdesoto, A.; Castro, N. (2020). Metodologías de investigación educativa (descriptivas, experimentales, participativas, y de investigación-acción). RECIMUNDO, 4(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/4.(3).julio.2020.163-173

Hernández, J.; Díaz, S.; Hernández, G.; León, L. (2024). Implementación de microcontrolador Arduino en prácticas de electrónica digital como estrategia de aprendizaje. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(4), 13488–13504. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i5.13757

Hurtuk, J.; Adam, N.; Chovanec, M. (2017). The Arduino platform connected to education process. IEEE 21st International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/INES.2017.8118531

Kondaveeti, H. K.; Kumaravelu, N. K.; Vanambathina, S. D.; Mathe, S. E.; Vappangi, S. (2021). A systematic literature review on prototyping with Arduino: Applications, challenges, advantages, and limitations. Computer Science Review, 40, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100364

Kumar, G.; Singh, O. P.; Saini, H. (2021). Cybersecurity: Ambient Technologies, IoT, and Industry 4.0 Implications (Vol. 1). CRC Press.

Lee, S. J.; Kwon, K. (2024). A systematic review of AI education in K-12 classrooms from 2018 to 2023: Topics, strategies, and learning outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100211

Manikanawar, S.; Kulkarni, V. N.; Gaitonde, V. N.; Satish, G. J.; Kotturshettar, B. B. (2021). A state-of-the-art review on Industry 4.0 and related key technologies. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2358(1), 020006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0057994

Marín-Marín, J. A.; García-Tudela, P. A.; Duo-Terrón, P. (2024). Computational thinking and programming with Arduino in education: A systematic review for secondary education. Heliyon, 10(8), e29177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29177

Mercorelli, P.; Nemati, H.; Zhu, Q. (2024). Industry 4.0 more than a challenge in modeling, identification, and control for cyber-physical systems. En Modeling, Identification, and Control for Cyber-Physical Systems Towards Industry 4.0. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-32-395207-1.00010-X

Moncayo, H.; Alulima, L.; Mena, M.; Zárate, L. (2023). Empowering electronics learning through a hands-on approach: Arduino projects in the classroom. IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education & Research (ICALTER), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALTER61411.2023.10372878

Montiel, H.; Gomez-Zermeño, M. G. (2021). Educational challenges for computational thinking in K–12 education: A systematic literature review of “Scratch” as an innovative programming tool. Computers, 10(6), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10060069

Narong, D. K.; Hallinger, P. (2024). Traversing the evolution of research on engineering education for sustainability: A bibliometric review (1991–2022). Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(2), 6401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020641

Nguyen, T.-T.; Hoang, D.-L.; Nguyen, H.-T. L.; Nguyen, T.-B. (2021). STEM-oriented activities for improving student performance in Chu Van An secondary school, Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012053

Rodriguez-Sanchez, C.; Orellana, R.; Fernandez, P. R.; Borromeo, S.; Vaquero, J. (2024). Insights 4.0: Transformative learning in industrial engineering through problem-based learning and project-based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4), e22736. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22736

Ruiz-Bolívar, C.; Ríos-Cabrera, P. (2020). La innovación educativa en América Latina: Lineamientos para la formulación de políticas públicas. Innovaciones Educativas, 22(32), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v22i32.2828

Soenarto, S.; Sugito, S.; Suyanta, S.; Siswantoyo, S.; Marwanti, M. (2020). Vocational and senior high school professional teachers in Industry 4.0 | Guru profesional di sekolah menengah atas dan sekolah menengah kejuruan di era industri 4.0. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32926

Sulayman, A. A.; Araromi, D. O.; Ayodele, O. E.; Araromi, H. O.; Osuolale, F. N. (2024). Arduino microcontroller based real-time monitoring of haemodialysis process for patients with kidney disease. E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 7, 100403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2023.100403

Tupac-Yupanqui, M.; Vidal-Silva, C.; Pavesi-Farriol, L.; Sanchez Ortiz, A.; Cardenas-Cobo, J.; Pereira, F. (2022). Exploiting Arduino features to develop programming competencies. IEEE Access, 10, 20602–20615. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3150101

Udvaros, J.; Gubán, M.; Gubán, Á.; Sándor, Á. (2023). Industry 4.0 from the perspective of Education 4.0. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.59287/ijanser.705

Umbara, D. M. A. (2024). Revolutionizing Education 4.0: Evaluating the role of robots in learning effectiveness. E3S Web of Conferences, 482, 05011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448205011

Statistics

Abstract
0
PDF accesses
0

Dimensions

PlumX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.