Chatgpt: El Nuevo Rol del Ingeniero Docente Frente al Conocimiento, la Investigación y la Redacción Científica

Omar Iván Trejos Buriticá; Luis Eduardo Muñoz Guerrero

doi:10.24050/reia.v22i44.1787

Chatgpt: the Change of the Teacher’s Role in Face of Knowledge, Research and Scientific Writing

10.24050/reia.v22i44.1787

Published 2025-07-01

Articles

How to Cite

Chatgpt: the Change of the Teacher’s Role in Face of Knowledge, Research and Scientific Writing (O. I. Trejos Buriticá & L. E. Muñoz Guerrero, Trans.). (2025). Revista EIA, 22(44), 4403 pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v22i44.1787

Download Citation

Publication Data

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright statement

The authors exclusively assign to the Universidad EIA, with the power to assign to third parties, all the exploitation rights that derive from the works that are accepted for publication in the Revista EIA, as well as in any product derived from it and, in in particular, those of reproduction, distribution, public communication (including interactive making available) and transformation (including adaptation, modification and, where appropriate, translation), for all types of exploitation (by way of example and not limitation : in paper, electronic, online, computer or audiovisual format, as well as in any other format, even for promotional or advertising purposes and / or for the production of derivative products), for a worldwide territorial scope and for the entire duration of the rights provided for in the current published text of the Intellectual Property Law. This assignment will be made by the authors without the right to any type of remuneration or compensation.

Consequently, the author may not publish or disseminate the works that are selected for publication in the Revista EIA, neither totally nor partially, nor authorize their publication to third parties, without the prior express authorization, requested and granted in writing, from the Univeridad EIA.

Abstract Authors References Statistics

Abstract

CONTEXT: Technological advances have a great impact on the academic field, especially on the mentality of the teaching engineer, who must be rethought not only to take advantage of these advances but also so that they serve to strengthen learning and other demands that emerge from today’s professional world.
OBJECTIVE: This article is the product of a research developed to enrich the profile of teaching engineers’ tools to take advantage of programs such as ChatGPT from OpenAI, Bard from Google or Bing from Microsoft and that corresponds to the type of generative programs pre-trained on Transformer algorithms.
METHODOLOGY: The methodology included physical and electronic bibliographic immersion, interviews with university professors and experts in AI and Education as well as students.
RESULTS: The results constitute a very interesting basis for today’s teaching engineer to rethink his role in the classroom and consider that the world has changed enough to have everything to question the traditional teaching methods that still persist, wasting the potential of these tools.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that to the extent that the teaching engineer rethinks his role, he will be able to articulate with engineering students who will be prepared to appropriately insert themselves into today’s society.

Keywords

Authors

Omar Iván Trejos Buriticá

Colombia

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-6014 (unauthenticated)
Luis Eduardo Muñoz Guerrero

Colombia

References

Alam, A. (2021). Possibilities and Apprehensions in the ladscape of Artificial Intelligence in Education. IEEE, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697272

Aznarurian, L. (2017). Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje en la era digital. Madrid: Editorial Académica Española.

Barbara, J.; e. (2012). How to write a scientific article. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(5), pp. 512–517.

Beecher, K. (2017). Computationa thinking for solving problem. Londres: Charted Institute.

Bruner, J. (2010). Actos de significado. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.

Bullard, J. (2016). Creating environments of learning. Washington: Pearson.

Cabero, J.P. (2020). Marcos de competencias digitales para docentes universitarios. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(3), pp. 17–34.

Carrillo, C.; e. (2012). Desarrollo del pensamiento científico. Bogotá: Instituto del Desarrollo Pedagógico IDEP.

Coronel de León, I. (2022). Conectivismo. Rompiendo paradigmas en la educación universitaria. Una mirada desde la sociedad del conocimiento. Revista Venezolana de Ciencia y Tecnología REVENCYT, (54), pp. 159–168.

Dabbagh, N.; e. (2018). Meaning Online Learning. Londres: Routledge.

Day, R. (2005). How to write and publish scientific works. Washington: The Oryx Press.

Díaz, B. (2010). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Buenos Aires: McGraw Hill Interamericana.

Enkeljda, K.; e. (2023). ChatGPT for good? opportunities and challege. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, pp. 20–29.

Flores, J.G. (2023). Refflexiones sobre la ética, potencialidades y retos de la Inteligencia Artificial en el marco de la Educación de Calidad (ODS4). Comunicar Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-03

Incio, F.; e. (2022). Inteligencia Artificial en educación: revisión de literatura científica. Revista de Investigación Apuntes Universitarios, 12(1), pp. 353–373. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v12i1.974

Jara, I.O. (2020). Usos y efectos de la Inteligencia Artificial en Educación. Santiago de Chile: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.

Kohmke, L.M. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), pp. 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Kubricky, J.C. (2015). Teachers competences for the use of web pages in teaching as a part of technical education teachers ICT competences. Revista Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(5), pp. 3236–3242.

León, A.M. (2018). Ingenio, Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, una experiencia de ingeniería humanitaria. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace, 6(1), pp. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v6i1.12666

Lo, C. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on Education? Educ. Sci., 13, pp. 410–425. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Lumsdaine, R. (2006). Creative Problem Solving. Boston: Prentice.

Malik, G. (2018). An analysis of the role of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Teaching. Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques, 707, pp. 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8639-7_42

Martin, L.L. (2022). Análisis de las competencias digitales docentes desde los marcos e instrumentos de evaluación. International Journal of Education, 18, pp. 62–79.

Orozco, G. (2016). Validación cuestionario para determinar competencias digitales en profesores universitarios. En G. Orozco, Tecnología e innovación en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje, pp. 983–998. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro.

Rahman, M.W. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research. Appl. Sci., 13, pp. 140–161. https://doi.org/10.3390/

Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledges. Morrisville (NC): Lulu.com.

Sierra-Aguilar, J.; e. (2021). Metodología computacionalmente eficiente para resolver el despacho económico multiperiodo estocástico con restricciones de seguridad. Investigación e Innovación en Ingeniería, 9(2), pp. 130–141. https://doi.org/10.17081/invinno.9.2.4452

Strawser, M. (2022). Higher Education Implications for Teaching and Learning during COVID-19. London, UK: Lexington Books.

Trejos, O. (2015). Significado y Competencias. Pereira: Editorial Papiro.

Wing, J. (2017). Computational thinking. Boston: Oreilly Publishing.

Statistics

Abstract

0

PDF accesses

0

Dimensions

PlumX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Appearance

Language

Navigation

User

Chatgpt: the Change of the Teacher’s Role in Face of Knowledge, Research and Scientific Writing